|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- “Gulf Stream Turbines has developed a turbine system it says could
produce electricity continuously from the ocean current running from the
Gulf of Mexico and up the US Atlantic Coast “
- Gulf Stream turbine inventors seek investors
- Thursday March 25, 2010
- By James Cartledge
|
|
3
|
- Ocean energy is replenished by the sun and through tidal influences of
the moon and sun gravitational forces
- Near-surface winds induce wave action and cause wind-blown currents at
about 3% of the wind speed
- Tides cause strong currents into and out of coastal basins and rivers
- Ocean surface heating by some 70% of the incoming sunlight adds to the
surface water thermal energy, causing expansion and flow
- Wind energy is stronger over the ocean due to less drag, although
technically, only seabreezes are from ocean energy
|
|
4
|
- 16.1.1 Tidal Energy
- 16.1.2 Tidal Water Turbines
- 16.2.1 Wave Energy
- 16.3 Ocean Thermal Energy Convertors
- 16.4 Ocean Currents
- 16.5 Ocean Wind
- 16.6 Economics
- 16.0 Conclusion
|
|
5
|
- Tidal mills were used in the Tenth and Eleventh Centuries in England,
France, and elsewhere
- Millpond water was trapped at high tide by a gate (Difficult working
hours for the miller! Why?)
- Deben estuary, Woodbridge, Suffolk, England has been operating since
1170 (reminiscent of “the old family axe”; only had three new handles
and two new heads!)
- Brooklyn NY had tidal mill at Bull Creek in 1636 (details at http://watercourses.typepad.com/watercourses/water-old-mill-creekbull-creek-east-new-yorkcanarsie-brooklyn/)
- Rhode Island, USA, 18th Century, 20-ton wheel 11 ft in
diameter and 26 ft wide **
- Slade’s Mill in Chelsea, MA founded 1734, 100HP, operated until ~1980
- Hamburg, Germany, 1880 “mill” pumped sewage
- Tidal mills were common in USA north of Cape Cod, where a 3 m range
exists [Redfield, 1980]
|
|
6
|
- Tides are produced by gravitational forces of the moon and sun and the
Earth’s rotation
- Existing and possible sites:
- France: 1966 La Rance river estuary 240 MW station
- Tidal ranges of 8.5 m to 13.5 m; 10 reversible turbines
- England: Severn River proposed
- Canada: Passamaquoddy Bay in the Bay of Fundy (1935 attempt failed);
Truro Bay site operational.
- California: high potential along the northern coast
- Environmental, economic, and esthetic aspects have delayed
implementation
- Power is asynchronous with daily load cycle
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Potential energy = ∫ S from 0 to 2H (ρgz dz),
- where S is basin area, H is tidal amplitude (high to low), ρ is
water density, and g is the gravitational constant
yielding 2 S ρ gH2
- Mean power is 2 S ρ gH2/tidal period; semidiurnal better
- Tidal Pool Arrangements
- Single-pool empties on ebb tide (going low)
- Single-pool fills on flood tide (going high)
- Single-pool fills and empties through turbine (both ways)
- Two-pool ebb- and flood-tide system; two ebbs per day; alternating pool
use
- Two-pool one-way system (high and low pools) (turbine located between
pools)
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Current flow converted to rotary motion by tidal current
- Turbines placed across The Rance River, France
- Large Savonius rotors (J. S. Savonius, 1932?) placed across channel to
rotate at slow speed but creating high torque (a large current meter)
- Horizontal rotors proposed for Gulf Stream placement off Miami, Florida
by FAU (Dr. Rick Driscoll, Director)
- East River, NYC, has some turbines installed
- Blades failed at hub, and now
replaced with new
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- 240 MW plant with 24, 10 MW turbines operated since 1966
- Average head is 28 ft
- Area is approximately 8.5 square miles
- Flow approx, 6.64 billion cubic feet
- Maximum theoretical energy is 7734 million kWh/year; 6% extracted
- Storage pumping contributes 1.7% to energy level
- At neap tides, generates 80,000 kWh/day; at equinoctial spring tide,
1,450,000 kWh/day (18:1 ratio!); average ~500 million kWh/year
- Produces electricity cheaper than oil, coal, or nuclear plants in France
|
|
15
|
- Proposed to be located between Maine (USA) and New Brunswick
- Average head is 18.1 ft
- Flow is approximately 70 billion cubic feet per tidal cycle
- Area is approximately 142 square miles
- About 3.5 % of theoretical maximum would be extracted
- Two-pool approach greatly lowers maximum theoretical energy
- International Commission studied it 1956 through 1961 and found project
uneconomic then
- Deferred until economic conditions change
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Annapolis River, Nova Scotia: straight-flow turbines; demonstration
plant was to be completed in 1983; 20 MW; tides 29 to 15 feet; Tidal
Power Corp.; ~$74M
- Experimental site at Kislaya Guba on Barents Sea
- French 400 kW unit operated since 1968
- Plant floated into place and sunk: dikes added to close gaps
- Sea of Okhotsk (former Sov. Union) under study in 1980
- White Sea, Russia: 1 MW, 1969
- Murmansk, Russia: 0.4 MW
- Kiansghsia in China
|
|
18
|
- Severn River, Great Britain: range of 47 feet (14.5 m) calculated output
of 2.4 MWh annually. Proposed at $15B, but not economic.
- Chansey Islands: 20 miles off Saint Malo, France; 34 billion kWh per
year; not economic; environmental problems; project shelved in 1980
- San Jose, Argentina: potential of 75 billion kWh/year; tidal range of 20
feet (6m)
- China built several plants in the 1950s
- Korean potential sites (Garolim Bay)
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Change of water level by tide or wave can move or raise a float,
producing linear motion from sinusoidal motion
- Water current can turn a turbine to yield rotational mechanical energy
to drive a pump or generator
- Slow rotation speed of
approximately one revolution per second to one revolution per
minute less likely to harm marine life
- Turbine reduces energy downstream and could protect shoreline
- Archimedes Wave Swing is a Dutch device [Smith, p. 91]
|
|
21
|
- Wave energy potential varies greatly worldwide
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- E = 1/8 ρ g H2
- Where E = energy, and H is the high-to-low wave height
- P = E n C
- Where P = power in the wavefront, n = the ratio of energy propagation
to the phase speed, and C = phase speed of the wave
- P = ρ g2TH2 / (32 pi)
- Where P = power, g = gravitation constant, T = wave period, and H =
wave height
|
|
24
|
- Scottish physicist Prof. Stephen Salter invented “Nodding Duck” energy
converter in 1970
- Salter “ducks” rock up and down as the wave passes beneath it. This
oscillating mechanical energy is converted to electrical energy
- Destroyed by storm
- A floating two-tank version drives hydraulic rams that send pressurized
oil to a hydraulic motor that drives a generator, and a cable conducts
electricity to shore
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Waves can be funneled and channeled into a rising chute to charge a
reservoir over a weir or through a swing-gate
- Water passes through waterwheel or turbine back to the ocean
- Algerian V-channel [Kotch, p.228]
- Wave forces require an extremely strong structure and mechanism to
preclude damage
- The Ocean Power Delivery wave energy converter Pelamis has articulated
sections that stream from an anchor towards the shore
- Waves passing overhead produce hydraulic pressure in rams between
sections
- This pressure drives hydraulic motors that spin generators, and power
is conducted to shore by cable
- 750 kW produced by a group 150m long and 3.5m diameter
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Davis Hydraulic Turbines since
1981
- Most tests done in Canada
- 4 kW turbine tested in Gulf Stream
- Blue Energy of Canada developing two 250 kW turbines for British
Columbia
- Also proposed Brothers Island tidal fence in San Francisco Bay,
California 1000 ft long by 80 ft deep to produce 15 – 25 MW
- Australian Port Kembla (south of
- Sydney) to produce 500 kW
|
|
29
|
- British invention uses an air-driven Wells turbine with symmetrical
blades
- Incoming waves pressurize air within a heavy concrete box, and trapped
air rushes upward through pipe connecting the turbine
- A Wavegen™, wave-driven, air compressor or oscillating water column
(OWC) spins a two-way Wells turbine to produce electricity
- Wells turbine is spun to starting speed by external electrical power and
spins the same direction regardless of air flow direction
- Energy estimated at 65 megawatts per mile
|
|
30
|
- A floating buoy can compress
trapped air similar to a whistle buoy
- The oscillating water column (OWC) in a long pipe under the buoy will
lag behind the buoy motion due to inertia of the water column
- The compressed air spins a turbine/alternator to generate electricity at
$0.09/kWh
|
|
31
|
- Large synthetic rubber bags filled with water could be placed offshore
where large waves pass overhead
- Also respond to tides
- A connecting pipe conducts hydraulic pressure to a positive
displacement motor that spins a generator
- The motor can turn a generator to make electricity that varies
sinusoidally with the pressure
- Rectify to charge batteries or use newer conversion technologies to
make 60 hertz output
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
- French Physicist Jacque D’Arsonval (meter inventor) proposed in 1881
- Georges Claude (neon lamp inventor) built Matanzos Bay, Cuba 22 kW OTEC
plant in 1930 [Smith, p.94]
- Keahole Point, Hawaii has the US 50 kW research OTEC barge system
- OTEC requires some 36 to 40°F temperature difference between the surface
and deep waters to extract energy
- Open-cycle plants vaporize warm water and condense it using the cold sea
water, yielding potable water and electricity from turbines-driven
alternators
- Closed-cycle units evaporate ammonia at 78°F to drive a turbine and an
alternator
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- In the 1977 era, FSEC was involved (Dr. David Block) in the Florida OTEC
plans for a Key West station using the barge
- http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/1981/PV1981_2563.pdf has a report on the
installation
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- Can energy extraction stop the Gulf Stream? Some are alarmed due to
potential climate change!
- Will the UK freeze?
- Note the wandering gyres east of Delmarva
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
- Florida Atlantic University at Dania has established the $5M Florida
Center of Excellence in Ocean Energy Technology to investigate Gulf
Stream energy
- The basic approach is to lower a turbine with a 10-foot diameter,
three-bladed rotor several hundred feet into the Gulf Stream and take
measurements
- They estimate that ocean energy could supply 30% of Florida’s
electricity needs
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
- Assume a “tube” of air the diameter, D, of the rotor
- A length, L, of air moves through the turbine in t seconds
- L = u·t, where u is the wind speed
- The tube volume is V = A·L = A·u·t
- Air density, ρ, is 1.225 kg/m3 (water density ~1000 kg/m3)
- Mass, m = ρ·V = ρ·A·u·t, where V is volume
- Kinetic energy = KE = ½ mu2
|
|
48
|
- Substituting ρ·A·u·t for mass, and
A = π D2/4
, KE = ½·π/4·ρ·D2·u3·t
- Theoretical power, Pt = ½·π/4·ρ·D2·u3·t/t
= 0.3927·ρa·D2·u3,
ρ (rho) is the density, D is the diameter swept by the rotor
blades, and u is the speed parallel to the rotor axis
- Betz Law shows 59.3% of power can be extracted
- Pe = Pt·59.3%·ήr·ήt·ήg,
where Pe is the extracted power, ήr is rotor
efficiency, ήt is transmission efficiency, and ήg
is generator efficiency
- For example, 59.3%·90%·98%·80% = 42% extraction of theoretical power
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
- Cost of installation, operation, removal and restoration
- Compare cost/watt & cost/watt-hour vs. other sources
- Relative total costs compared to other sources
- Externality costs aren’t included in most assessments
- Cost of money (inflation) must be included (2 to 5%/year)
- Life of energy plant varies and treated as linear depreciation to zero
- Tax incentives or credits offset the hidden subsidies to fossil fuel and
nuclear industry
- Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) require early funding to justify
permitting
|
|
54
|
- Offshore winds are unhindered and strong
- The tidal gravitational forces and thermal storage of the ocean can
provide a major energy source
- Wave action adds to the extractable surface energy, but is less than
tidal energy
- Major ocean currents (like the Gulf Stream) may be exploited to extract
energy with strong underwater rotors similar to wind turbines
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
- Boyle, Godfrey. Renewable Energy, Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2004, ISBN 0-19-26178-4. (my preferred text)
- Brower, Michael. Cool Energy. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1992.
0-262-02349-0, TJ807.9.U6B76, 333.79’4’0973.
- Duffie, John and William A. Beckman. Solar Engineering of Thermal
Processes. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 920 pp., 1991
- Gipe, Paul. Wind Energy for Home & Business. White River Junction,
VT: Chelsea Green Pub. Co., 1993. 0-930031-64-4, TJ820.G57, 621.4’5
- Patel, Mukund R. Wind and Solar Power Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press,
1999, 351 pp. ISBN 0-8493-1605-7, TK1541.P38 1999, 621.31’2136
- Sørensen, Bent. Renewable Energy, Second Edition. San Diego: Academic
Press, 2000, 911 pp. ISBN 0-12-656152-4.
- Texter, [MIT]
|
|
57
|
- http://folk.ntnu.no/hals/nedlasting/lysark/WaveEnergy.ppt#444,81,The
Swedish IPS buoy
- http://www.nrel.gov/otec/
- awea-windnet@yahoogroups.com. Wind Energy elist
- awea-wind-home@yahoogroups.com.
Wind energy home powersite elist
- mailto:energyresources@egroups.com
- rredc.nrel.gov/wind/pubs/atlas/maps/chap2/2-01m.html PNNL wind energy
map of CONUS windenergyexperimenter@yahoogroups.com. Elist for wind energy experimenters
- www.dieoff.org. Site devoted to the decline of energy and effects upon
population
- www.ferc.gov/ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- www.hawaii.gov/dbedt/ert/otec_hi.html#anchor349152 on OTEC systems
- telosnet.com/wind/20th.html
- www.google.com/search?q=%22renewable+energy+course%22
- solstice.crest.org/
- dataweb.usbr.gov/html/powerplant_selection.html
- http://rads.tudelft.nl/gulfstream/
- http://www.fujitaresearch.com/reports/tidalpower.html
- http://media.wiley.com/product_data/excerpt/9X/04701070/047010709X.pdf
- http://www.instructables.com/id/Build-your-own-Savonius-VAWT-Vertical-Axis-Wind-T/
|
|
58
|
- Lockheed Martin and Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. plan to develop
utility-scale PowerBuoy systems
- DOI Sec’y Salazar plans offshore energy strategy for wind, wave, and
ocean current
- Stimulus Act provides EERE with $16.8B, 10 times the 2008 budget
- Marine Current Turbines Ltd. developing tidal facilities at the Bay of
Fundy, Canada, a 1.5MW tidal flow generator
- News from ON&T, March, 2009
|